You don't really need feminism

You don't really need feminism

Lets have some fun shall we?
I do not condone the sending of anon hate to anyone for any reason.
Email:dontneedfeminism@hotmail.com
Skype: dontneedfeminism
Recent Tweets @

true-justice-moogle:

sizvideos:

Watch it in video

Follow our Tumblr

This is so one-sided and narrow visioned, it borders on being hilarious.

  1. Let’s tackle gif one…the magazines, um so do the video makers not think men see magazines and wish they had the bodies of the guys on them? Because let me assure you, this DOES happen. Men may not protest or complain about it as vocally as women do, but it does sit in their minds and they do dwell on their “imperfect” physical prowesses. If they didn’t, would you really see so many guys hitting up the gym or casually mentioning how they want to get a six-pack? Buff muscle bound actors, musicians, model men are plastered across all sorts of women’s and men’s magazines. Men get to see the burly adonis-like physiques of people like Hugh Jackman, Brad Pitt (well…back in the day), David Beckham, Zac Efron, Bradley Cooper, Chris Evans, Chris Hemsworth, etc, front and center on the magazine aisles right next to the women who are shown just the same.

    The only reason men are less vocal in this insecurity is they are taught not to complain, that complaining will do nothing, so they have to either just give up and distress about it or hit the gym constantly, or….learn to be okay and happy with the bodies they have, but I can assure you, even if it isn’t vocally expressed, the third option is not the norm, sadly.

  2. Gif two…Superhero movies are predominantly male power centered, I get that so I concede that much. But the TV shows, reverse versions of King of Queens, Family Guy, Still Standing, shows where an overweight man has somehow scored a relatively bombshell fit/thin wife. But the problem the video makers intentionally fail to mention is that in those shows, the men suffer from being made to look utterly and appallingly idiotic. These men may have scored a hot wife, but not only is she hot, she is almost always portrayed as the voice of reason and sensibility, the smart one, the true heroine to all the man’s blundering stupidity. So these men may have scored a hot wife, but it always comes at the cost of their blithering lack of intelligence.

    So really who is the sexism against here? Is it sexist to say that men despite their physical appearance can still get a very attractive spouse? Or is it more sexist and quite fat-shaming to portray these obese men as having no redeeming qualities, to make a stereotyped trope of the idiotic fat husband? I’d say the latter is farrrrr more sexist and disgusting a trope than simply the hot wife being the smart, reasonable, praised one who happens to be married to a guy that is physically “out of her league”. You can whine about “benevolent sexism”, but really….? Portraying the men as idiotic, slobbish, fat guys is tons more sexist and fat-shaming, overall it is much worse than the role of the women in these shows. End of story.

  3. Gif three…So the video makers are trying to say that men just don’t experience catcalls, wolf whistles, and being objectified? Try again. This happens quite as much as it happens to women. Guys just vocally express their uncomfortability with it, less. And many guys just simply try to take it as a compliment. But men face these things too, stop trying to make it all “if men were women hurr durr durr then they’d deal with this stuff and be so uncomfy and they’d KNOW what women have to deal with, it’s so hard for women”. But men ALREADY DO face these scenarios. Next!

  4. Gif four…People saying “it’s hard to find a funny woman”, are sexist assholes, point blank. But this IS NOT the majority opinion, this is an INDIVIDUAL opinion. Stop trying to make this opinion seem as if it is something mainstream, it isn’t. If it was, I Love Lucy, which is quite possibly the most successful television show of the 1950s, and maybe even the 60s, would never have had so much success. The demographic of those who watched the show were equal in sex, the show came on in the primetime hours, it was a family show and families would sit around and watch it together and laugh TOGETHER. People, MEN and women, thought the antics of Lucille Ball and her comedy show were the height of hilarity. So men on the whole DO find women funny, because the aspect of what they find funny on the whole has nothing to do with the sex of the person delivering the humour. Like I said, this opinion of “you’re funny for a girl” does circulate, indeed, but it is on an individual basis, not a societal mainstream basis.

  5. The last gif…I think we can all concede that seeing a good woman president in office would be very refreshing on terms of gender opportunities having occupied the Oval Office. But just because there hasn’t been a woman president does not mean that women aren’t allowed to be president. The track for the presidency is open to anyone who is qualified for it, there is no statute which bars the presidency from a candidate based on their sex or gender. Women might feel discouraged from pursuing the presidency as this gif is trying to portray, but it is inherently misleading that this gif doesn’t bother to show the milestones and paved paths that soon enough a woman president is a strong possibility.

    Times have changed a lot, we see more and more women in political positions, positions which signify power, responsibility, and the leadership and representation of the people. Women like Condoleeza Rice, Hilary Clinton, Sarah Palin (even if I and most people don’t like her, she still showed some headway for women in pursuit of those executive political positions), Sonia Sotomayor, Ruth Bader Ginsberg, Madeleine Albright, Janet Reno, Margaret Thatcher (for leadership potential in general for the world-through, yes I know she isn’t American), Wendy Davis, and so on and so on. So the gif is being intentionally misguiding in painting the future as if women will never become president, when signs are pointing so strongly to the future being bright and more and more welcoming for a woman president.

It’s so sad to see how people have swallowed this down in reblogs with a clear lack of critical thinking. These gifs are a clear-cut case of the video makers painting issues how they want other to perceive them, not how things really are, or that an equal or close equivalent is almost always at hand on the other side.

-Mog

(via real-justice-waluigi)

Asker Anonymous Asks:
So let me see if I have this right, according to Waluigi, it's ok to make sure something has no future, but it's not ok to allow it to have a future, minus a foreskin? Would it be ok if there was a way to circumcise in utero? I'm trying to see where the line is drawn for you.
dontneedfeminism dontneedfeminism Said:

sjwstupidity:

lifevirus:

sjwstupidity:

real-justice-waluigi:

Is this about my views on abortion?

Let’s look at the differences between a fetus and a child about to have a circumcision, shall we?

A fetus can’t feel pain before 24 weeks.  A child about to have a circumcision?  Can 100% feel pain.

A fetus cannot survive outside of it’s mother before a certain time period (roughly the third trimester.)  A child can.

Children are conscious.  A fetus isn’t.

A fetus has no idea that it is being aborted, because it doesn’t have the cognitive ability to understand the concept.  A child understands pain and is conscious enough to know that something is very, very wrong during circumcision.

Abortion is like you’re getting the ingredients to bake a cake…but while the ingredients are still in the mixing bowl you decide you don’t want a cake and you scoop it out into the trash.

Infant circumcision is like making the cake to completion, then before serving it you scrape all the frosting off.

As a circumcised individual, I have no memory of the pain and am told that I slept through the ordeal.

Infants can’t remember anything.  117 infants die each year from either blood loss or shock.  (Shock can actually knock you unconscious, and for an infant it would look like they’re sleeping peacefully).

I think if you look back through my circumcision tag on my blog you could find a series of photos from facebook of a mother who had her infant circumcised and she said that “He didn’t cry a bit, look at him sleeping peacefully.”  Later the infant’s heart stopped and they were unable to resuscitate him.  He died of complications resulting from circumcision.

I wish people would stop chiming in with testimony like “well they did it to me and it was no big deal so I don’t see what the fuss is.”  I was circumcised, and it has significantly effected the sensation in the head of my penis.  Loss of about 20,000 nerve endings can tend to do that.

Asker Anonymous Asks:
What're your thoughts on Logicd? Do you think that he's one of the more decent anti-SJWs?
dontneedfeminism dontneedfeminism Said:

logicd:

ughsocialjustice:

sundays-end:

mickeyblowsyourmind:

vladimirnootin:

faephobia:

friendlylunk:

faephobia:

vladimirnootin:

>Logicd

>”decent”

How the flying fuck is logicd ‘one of the more decent anti-SJWs’? He’s disgustingly bigoted (sexist, racist, transphobe), highly aggressive, a bully, completely unfunny (I’m sorry but “hurr feminists think they are so strong but would cry while being raped” is not funny), and seems to mistake a lack of empathy for logic and appeal to ridicule for an actual argument. He’s a horrible excuse for a human being. How the fuck is that ‘decent’?!

All these buzzwords, and not a single piece of evidence to back them up.

"Buzzwords"

lol

The thing is, even with evidence to be provided, they’ll never deem something as sexist/bigoted because they have different standards of what is deemed as sexist and bigoted. So what might seem like a very sexist action to us would probably be “logic” to them.

both lunk and logicd aren’t worth it.

I don’t know who Logicd is but he sounds like the prototypical fedora wearing douchebag. 

yeah logicd is sexist and racist. there’s tons of examples of his douchebaggery(I’m a bit surprised that no one’s done a masterpost on him)

~the aspie one

oh its vladimirnootin, should have known. how come you havent taken my offer up on proving I said the things you accused me of? I said I would delete my blog if you or any of your followers did. And what happened to your little doxxing hacker fellows who promised “vengeance” on me lmao.

anyway 2/10

no one even bothered to call me a rapist or child molester

>fedora wearer

apply yourselves guys, this is lame as hell

Asker Anonymous Asks:
Should I become an hero?
dontneedfeminism dontneedfeminism Said:

Nah.

Asker Anonymous Asks:
"Feminism is about equality for men and women. That's it. It's that simple. " Any comments?
dontneedfeminism dontneedfeminism Said:

Correction: Feminism is about women becoming equal to the level they perceive men to be at.

In reality, if Feminism was about *actually* making men and women equal, well, it’d basically be focusing 70-90% of its efforts on men’s issues right now.

But obviously that isn’t the case.

Not mine. Credit to whoever made it.

Asker navokob Asks:
i don't demonize men (although i admit that i can be very aggressive towards them at times such as this). of course men experience both similar and different ways of sexism - only in a much smaller scale (rape statistics etc). i expect them to acknowledge the fact that they're the ones who have the advantage and it obviously makes me very fucking pissed to see an anti-feminist guy.
dontneedfeminism dontneedfeminism Said:

sjwstupidity:

Much *chuckle* smaller *giggle* scale *laughing fit*!!!

Oh you mean how men inside American prisons alone get raped more than women throughout America?

 [Source] [Source] [Source]

Oh but god forbid we acknowledge our prisoners as also being “men.”  Let’s say they deserve it as part of their punishment for being indicted of a crime, even though most of the crimes are nonviolent, such as drugs or fraud (not to mention nobody deserves to be raped and suggesting as much would automatically make you a horrible human being).

Or let’s point out that it’s men raping other men, as if men are a hivemind and can just choose to “stop raping each other.”  Because pointing out the gender of the rapist, and the gender of the victim helps us stick to the narrative that rape is a gendered issue and not simply a crime issue!

These are all popular arguments I’ve heard for this, which one will you wield, or do you have something new for me?

Maybe you should see a shrink about your aggression issues.

Asker Anonymous Asks:
plebcomics literally harassed that girl to the point of suicide and we still don't know if she's alright
dontneedfeminism dontneedfeminism Said:

plebcomics:

autisticfoxmulder:

plebcomics:

autisticfoxmulder:

plebcomics:

autisticfoxmulder:

oh my god I can’t even believe this I hope she’s okay God plebcomics is fucking scum

"plebcomics tries so hard"

"as hard as you do for your parents’ affection"

"I’M AUTISTIC AND TRANS I’M GOING TO KILL MYSELF"

image

right right so you’re ableist too

"YOU’RE ABLEIST for saying she tries hard for her parents’ affection! Because she’s autistic!"
image

image

you think you’re like cool or whatever but really you’re a 27 year old harassing a 14 year old autistic abuse victim. Okay

"How dare you respond to an autistic abuse victim who addressed you first! FUCKING KILL YOURSELF U SHITLORD"
image

Asker Anonymous Asks:
if you spent eternity in hell to solve humanity's problems, in the end your suffering would surpass humanity's. say humanity lasts for another million years, that's 1 million years of suffering. however, you will be suffering for more than in living forever. plus unhappiness and human disaster will always exist, it may be in different forms but it's always there
dontneedfeminism dontneedfeminism Said:

gamaongaku:

sjwstupidity:

dontneedfeminism:

You forgot the part where I expect to be spending eternity in hell regardless, provided it exists.

But by sacrificing your eternal soul you’ll have committed the most selfless act imaginable, thus redeeming yourself, earning divine forgiveness for all sins, and gaining admittance into heaven. GG u win!

Unfortunately that’s not how the system works, mate. If you’ve ever committed a sin, then you cannot step foot into heaven. It wasn’t supposed to be a punishment, hell. God is perfect, and because of this he cannot literally be near an imperfect being. So unless we accept Jesus paying for our sins, we have our sins on our records.

Well y’all can have fun up in heaven with all those catholic priests and their choir boys then, seeing as how accepting jesus apparently wipes their slate clean for good.

Maybe I can convince Satan to play some poker.

Asker Anonymous Asks:
if you spent eternity in hell to solve humanity's problems, in the end your suffering would surpass humanity's. say humanity lasts for another million years, that's 1 million years of suffering. however, you will be suffering for more than in living forever. plus unhappiness and human disaster will always exist, it may be in different forms but it's always there
dontneedfeminism dontneedfeminism Said:

sjwstupidity:

dontneedfeminism:

You forgot the part where I expect to be spending eternity in hell regardless, provided it exists.

But by sacrificing your eternal soul you’ll have committed the most selfless act imaginable, thus redeeming yourself, earning divine forgiveness for all sins, and gaining admittance into heaven. GG u win!

Or I just end up in limbo.